Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Lawsuits Updates | Ludwig Ovarian Cancer Lawyers

Follow the latest Johnson & Johnson talcum powder lawsuit updates as courts in the U.S. and U.K. hold J&J accountable for asbestos-contaminated products. Recent verdicts include a $966M California judgment, a $42M Massachusetts win, and mediation orders in nationwide cancer claims. Ludwig Law Firm continues to track these developments for Arkansas families affected by talc-related injuries.

PERSONAL INJURY (CLAIMS AND DAMAGES)MASS TORTS

Ludwig Law Firm

10/28/20257 min read

We Simply Win Talcum Powder Torts

The damage done by the negligence of large companies isn’t just another tragedy — it’s an attack on the consumer. And with Ludwig Law Firm, you’re not fighting it alone.

📞 Call Ludwig Law Firm today at 501-838-4043
🌐 Visit us at ludwiglawfirm.com
📍 Proudly serving clients across Arkansas

Disclaimer: The information provided in this blog is for general informational purposes only and is not intended as legal advice. Reading this blog or interacting with Ludwig Law Firm through this content does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every legal case is different, and you should not act or rely on any information in this blog without first consulting with a licensed attorney about your specific situation. For legal guidance tailored to your needs, please contact Ludwig Law Firm directly.

2. J&J Ordered to Pay Nearly $1 Billion Mesothelioma Verdict

Latest J&J Lawsuit Update | October 9, 2025

A Los Angeles jury has ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $966 million to the family of Mae Moore, who died from mesothelioma in 2021 at the age of 88.

Moore, a mother of three, used J&J’s talc-based baby powder products on herself and her children for years. Her family’s lawsuit alleged that these powders contained asbestos, leading to her cancer diagnosis and death.

The verdict included $16 million in compensatory damages and $950 million in punitive damages, underscoring the jury’s view of J&J’s responsibility in marketing products linked to asbestos exposure. While the company plans to appeal, the verdict represents one of the most significant rebukes of J&J’s defense strategy to date.

At Ludwig Law Firm, we view these decisions as critical milestones for families seeking justice in talc-related cancer cases. Each verdict sends a clear message: corporate concealment of health risks has real consequences.

3. Judge Increases Connecticut Talc Verdict to $25 Million

News on Talcum Powder Claims | October 3, 2025

In another major setback for Johnson & Johnson, a Connecticut judge increased a talc verdict against the company to $25 million, adding $10 million in punitive damages.

The plaintiff, Evan Plotkin, was originally awarded $15 million in 2024 after developing mesothelioma from long-term use of J&J’s talc-based products. The additional damages were imposed to penalize J&J for what the court described as negligent conduct and disregard for consumer safety.

J&J has vowed to appeal the ruling, but this expanded judgment further reinforces the growing pattern of accountability emerging across jurisdictions.

Ludwig Law Firm continues to track these cases closely as juries and courts nationwide push back against corporate attempts to avoid liability for preventable harm.

4. Talcum Powder Trial Underway in Florida

Update on Talcum Powder Claims | October 1, 2025

A new Johnson & Johnson talcum powder trial is underway in Broward County, Florida, as the family of Dr. Salvatore Casaretto seeks justice following his death from mesothelioma in 2022.

The wrongful death claim alleges that Dr. Casaretto used J&J’s talc-based baby powder for over 50 years, exposing him to asbestos fibers the company failed to disclose. Plaintiffs argue that J&J marketed its powder as “pure” despite internal evidence suggesting contamination risks.

This trial represents one of several active state court proceedings moving forward since J&J’s bankruptcy attempts were rejected earlier this year.

At Ludwig Law Firm, we recognize the significance of these cases for Arkansas families and others affected nationwide. Each trial helps uncover facts that have remained hidden for decades, bringing long-overdue transparency to consumers.

5. J&J Fights to Block Talc Securities Lawsuit

Johnson & Johnson Lawsuit Update | September 25, 2025

Johnson & Johnson is now facing additional pressure from its own investors. A talcum powder class action lawsuit filed by shareholders alleges the company misled investors about the risks of asbestos contamination in its talc products.

Investors claim that these omissions caused significant financial losses and damaged the company’s reputation as thousands of cancer lawsuits emerged. In September 2025, J&J petitioned an appeals court to block the shareholder case from proceeding.

Though separate from the personal injury and wrongful death suits, the securities litigation adds another layer of accountability, suggesting that J&J’s alleged misconduct affected not only consumers but also its investors.

Ludwig Law Firm continues to monitor both the consumer and shareholder actions as part of the broader pursuit of justice in talc-related cases.

6. Court Orders Talcum Powder Settlement Negotiations

Talc Powder Lawsuit Update | September 11, 2025

The federal judge overseeing the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder litigation has ordered both sides to engage in mediation this month in pursuit of a global settlement for ovarian cancer claims.

The order requires plaintiff attorneys to seek direct input from women involved in these lawsuits—ensuring that their voices are central to any potential resolution. This move comes after concerns that earlier settlement discussions failed to fully reflect victims’ perspectives.

If mediation does not succeed, trials may resume across multiple jurisdictions in late 2025.

At Ludwig Law Firm, we see this as a crucial moment for transparency and client advocacy. Meaningful settlement discussions must prioritize the individuals whose lives have been upended by preventable corporate conduct.

7. Bankruptcy Is Off The Table, and Veteran Mediator Faud Kurdi was Appointed to Lead Negotiations (Miller and Zois)

Talcum Powder Litigation Update | August 19, 2025

The nationwide litigation against Johnson & Johnson over its talcum powder products has entered what appears to be a defining stage. After years of delay, the company’s bankruptcy strategy has fully collapsed, and with it, the procedural barriers that stalled progress for thousands of women and families affected by ovarian cancer and other health complications.

With more than 66,000 active cases consolidated under MDL 2738, momentum is finally shifting toward resolution. In the past month alone, over 4,000 new claims have been filed. The rejection of J&J’s third and final bankruptcy attempt earlier this year cleared the way for normal litigation to resume—restoring access to discovery, trial scheduling, and independent state court proceedings that had been on hold.

A major development came with the appointment of veteran mediator Fouad Kurdi, who has led negotiations in other multi-billion-dollar mass tort settlements. U.S. District Judge Michael Shipp granted Kurdi broad authority to direct the mediation process and required both parties to send representatives with full settlement authority. This move reflects the court’s clear intent to encourage meaningful settlement discussions rather than procedural posturing.

While Johnson & Johnson continues to resist settlement talks publicly, the reality of mounting jury verdicts, accelerating case volume, and coordinated mediation creates substantial pressure for the company to engage in a comprehensive resolution.

With the bankruptcy barrier is gone, mediation underway, and bellwether trials taking shape, plaintiffs and their advocates are rounding the corner. Initial mediation sessions are scheduled for September, with the first bellwether trials anticipated to start in late 2025. Should mediation fail to produce an agreement, these early jury trials could set critical benchmarks for future verdicts and settlements nationwide.

Either path—settlement or trial—marks the closest this litigation has come to true resolution in years. The procedural clarity, combined with renewed judicial oversight, has created a long-awaited window for progress.

At Ludwig Law Firm, we continue to monitor developments closely and advocate for transparency and accountability in large-scale litigation that affects Arkansas families. When corporate misconduct causes widespread harm, the civil justice system must move decisively to deliver answers, compensation, and change.

8. J&J to Pay $42 Million in Massachusetts Talc Verdict

Talcum Powder Litigation Update | August 7, 2025

A Boston jury has ordered Johnson & Johnson to pay $42.6 million to Paul Lovell and his family after determining that his mesothelioma was caused by decades of using the company’s talc-based baby powder.

J&J argued that its products were asbestos-free, but the jury disagreed after reviewing expert testimony and internal company documents. This decision is believed to be the largest mesothelioma verdict in Massachusetts history.

The ruling reinforces the pattern seen in other states, where juries have held J&J accountable for concealing known product risks.

At Ludwig Law Firm, we believe verdicts like this demonstrate the essential role of the civil justice system in protecting consumers and ensuring that corporations cannot obscure the truth to avoid responsibility.

Contact Us

For a Free Case Evaluation

1. Thousands Join UK Lawsuit Against Johnson & Johnson Over Asbestos-Tainted Talc

Talcum Powder Litigation Update | October 15, 2025

More than 3,000 people in the United Kingdom have filed a lawsuit against Johnson & Johnson, alleging the company knowingly sold asbestos-contaminated baby powder that caused ovarian cancer and mesothelioma.

The claims, filed in London’s High Court, accuse J&J and its subsidiaries—Johnson & Johnson Management and Kenvue UK—of concealing asbestos risks for decades and prioritizing profits over consumer safety.

Court filings allege that J&J continued marketing talc-based products as “pure” despite internal evidence showing contamination. The company only stopped selling talc-based baby powder worldwide in 2023, three years after ending U.S. and Canadian sales.

Kenvue, now responsible for claims outside North America, denies the allegations, asserting that its talc complied with all regulations and does not cause cancer.

At Ludwig Law Firm, we continue to follow these international developments closely. Global cases like this underscore the critical role of the civil justice system in holding corporations accountable for public health risks.

Why Arkansans Choose Ludwig Mass Tort Lawyers

Arkansas Criminal Defense Attorney Kale Ludwig stands in front of the Arkansas Capitol Building.
Arkansas Criminal Defense Attorney Kale Ludwig stands in front of the Arkansas Capitol Building.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the Johnson & Johnson talcum powder lawsuit about?
Thousands of consumers allege that Johnson & Johnson’s talc-based baby powder contained asbestos, which caused ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. Lawsuits claim the company knew of the contamination risks but continued marketing the products as safe.

2. Has Johnson & Johnson stopped selling talc-based baby powder?
Yes. The company ended U.S. and Canadian sales in 2020 and discontinued global distribution in 2023, shifting to cornstarch-based products.

3. What are the latest talcum powder lawsuit updates?
As of October 2025, J&J faces more than 66,000 pending cases. Major verdicts include a $966 million award in California, a $42 million award in Massachusetts, and court-ordered settlement talks led by a federal mediator.

4. How long will the Johnson & Johnson settlement process take?
Global mediation is underway, but if talks fail, bellwether trials could resume in late 2025 and continue into 2026. Timelines depend on each jurisdiction’s court calendar.

5. Can Arkansas residents join the talcum powder lawsuits?
Yes. Arkansas residents who developed ovarian cancer or mesothelioma after using talc-based baby powder may be eligible to file claims. Ludwig Law Firm can evaluate individual cases and coordinate with national counsel if needed.

Arkansas Historic Supreme Court seats sit empty. This courthouse was established in 1836.
Arkansas Historic Supreme Court seats sit empty. This courthouse was established in 1836.